Yes I can. The author is using not only the facts but is discussing his side of the story and what he thinks about it. He is saying what ever he wants to persuade the audience to be in his favor.
- Genuine
- Honesty
- Critical of power
- Shows 2 sides of argument
Question 2: How might the story and/or language have been different if it's writer's free speech was not protected?
If the writer's free speech was not protected, the piece wouldn't have been as persuading as it is with his freedom of speech.
Question 3: Whose voice/story wouldn't be heard?
The real story wouldn't be heard. Or the side of the story that the author is opposing.
Question 4: Who would benefit?
The writer would benefit from freedom of speech because he can say what ever he wants to persuade the audience to agree with his side of the story.
No comments:
Post a Comment